Protesters have said they are angry Tony Blair "sneaked" into the Iraq inquiry venue ahead of his second session of evidence.
A protester wears a Tony Blair mask outside the QEII centre in London
Mr Blair arrived two hours before his hearing was set to begin, pausing briefly to allow photographers to take his picture.
In contrast to his previous evidence session, he was not greeted by hundreds of protesters as he got there before most had assembled.
Andrew Murray, chairman of the Stop The War Coalition, said the former prime minister had "sneaked in under cover of darkness".
He called on the panel to challenge Mr Blair to "tell the truth" about the legality of the war.
Another protester, Chris Nineham, told Sky News there remained "scepticism" about the hearings.
"There have been four of these inquiries and the truth hasn't come out," he said.
Mr Blair has been recalled to explain possible gaps and inconsistencies almost a year on from his last session before Sir John Chilcot and his panel.
Tony Blair arrived early, while it was still partially dark
Since then, the inquiry has heard from scores more witnesses and it is thought that some provided evidence which contradicted that given by Mr Blair.
Sir John Chilcot and his team have now also seen documents to which they did not have access a year ago.
Some of these documents have been declassified and placed on public record.
Others, including Mr Blair's private notes to former US president George W Bush, have not.
Against the wishes of the inquiry, the Cabinet Office has refused to declassify a number of memos written by Mr Blair to Mr Bush in the months prior to the invasion.
The panel has seen the memos and claims they provide "important and often unique insights into Mr Blair's thinking and the commitments he made to President Bush, not reflected in other papers".
Key Questions For Tony Blair
:: Why did he appear to ignore legal advice from his Attorney General?
:: What did he say to President Bush in private memos?
:: Did he over-egg incomplete intelligence?
:: Did he deliberately misinterpret Jacques Chirac to blame France for the failure of a second UN resolution?
But because the memos have not been declassified, they are unable to refer to their contents in public.
Among the declassified documents that could be referred to today is a note written by the former Attorney General Lord Goldsmith to Mr Blair two months before the invasion.
In the memo marked "secret", Lord Goldsmith states: "I remain of the view that the correct legal interpretation of resolution 1441 is that it does not authorise the use of military force without a further determination by the security council."
In the margin, next to this statement, are the words "I just don't understand this", in Mr Blair's handwriting.
In the past week alone, new testimony concerning the legal basis of the war has emerged.
In a new witness statement to the inquiry from Lord Goldsmith, there is a suggestion that Mr Blair had ignored, even contradicted, legal advice that he had been given.
Lord Goldsmith is asked whether the former prime minister's words, in a speech to Parliament and a separate TV interview, were compatible with the advice he had given Mr Blair.
Mr Blair is accused of deliberately misinterpreting comments by Jacques Chirac
He replied "no", adding that he had found Mr Blair's language "uncomfortable".
Also this week another witness, Sir Stephen Wall, who advised Mr Blair on European issues, claimed that Mr Blair deliberately misinterpreted the words of former French president Jacques Chirac.
According to Sir Stephen, Mr Blair knew that what he was claiming Mr Chirac had said was not an accurate translation of what he had actually said.
Mr Blair, it was claimed, told his director of communicationsAlastair Campbell to brief the tabloid newspapers with this incorrect interpretation in order to blame the French for the failure of securing a second UN resolution.
Another development since Mr Blair's last appearance comes in the form of his autobiography, A Journey, which was published last September.
In it, Mr Blair talks of his "anger and anguish" at being asked during his last appearance whether he had any regrets. He admits that his answer to the question was "incomplete".
He writes: "The anger was at being put in a position in an inquiry that was supposed to be about lessons learned, but had inevitably turned into a trial of judgement…"
@news.sky.com
No comments:
Post a Comment